ChartRow logo
Share this page

FSPTX vs XLK (2026)

FSPTX
▼
XLK
▼
+ Add ticker

Fidelity Select Technology Portfolio and Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund side by side. XLK is the cheaper fund (0.08% vs 0.61% expense ratio). Over the last five years XLK returned more (+130.62% vs +129.65%, total return). Their portfolios overlap by about 64% of weight. Not investment advice.

Returns as of market close, Oct 30, 2026. The charts run through the Oct 30 close.

FSPTXXLK
FocusSector FundsTechnology
Expense ratio0.61%0.08%
AUM$37B$123.9B
Distribution yield—0.49%
Holdings9174
1M total-7.0%-8.3%
YTD total+34.6%+25.1%
1Y total+29.0%+20.1%
3Y total+166%+125%
5Y total+130%+131%
10Y total—+738%
3Y total CAGR+38.5%/yr+31.0%/yr
5Y total CAGR+18.1%/yr+18.2%/yr
10Y total CAGR—+23.7%/yr
IssuerFidelityState Street
Inception—1998-12-16

All returns are total returns (dividends reinvested), through the latest price during the session. CAGR = compound annual growth rate. '—' means the fund's history doesn't span the horizon. A mutual fund's AUM is its whole fund's, every share class together (its SEC filing); an ETF's is its own. Returns run to Oct 30, 2026, the last month-end, as fund companies report a mutual fund's: a fund that pays monthly books each month's income on its last business day, so a return to a later day would leave that month's income out.

Annualized returns (CAGR)#

Data provided bySource: Twelve Data
FSPTXXLK

Compound annual growth rate per holding period, total return, from weekly adjusted closes. Horizons a fund's history can't span show no bar; horizons no fund spans are omitted.

Total return, rebased to 0% · FSPTX vs XLK
YearFSPTXXLK
2017—+34.3%
2018—-1.7%
2019—+49.9%
2020—+43.6%
2021+22.0%+34.7%
2022-36.9%-27.7%
2023+59.8%+56.0%
2024+35.3%+21.6%
2025+23.4%+24.6%
2026 YTD+34.6%+25.1%

Total returns (dividends reinvested), calendar years.

Returns by year, charted#

FSPTXXLK

Holdings overlap#

FSPTX and XLK overlap by about 64% of portfolio weight — 34 shared holdings out of 91 in FSPTX and 74 in XLK, from each fund's latest SEC filing (Aug 31, 2026 / Jun 30, 2026).

Only in FSPTX

ANTHROPIC PBC (3.5%), AMZN (2.9%), OKTA (1.9%), TSM (1.8%), NXP SEMICONDUCTORS NV (1.7%) and 52 more.

Only in XLK

TXN (1.7%), IBM (1.4%), ANET (1.2%), ADI (1.2%), QCOM (1.1%) and 35 more.

Top 10 holdings, side by side#

FSPTXXLK

Merged top 10 across the funds — each column is the holding's % of that fund.

Sector weights#

SectorFSPTXXLK
Technology87.6%99.3%
Consumer Discretionary3.2%0.0%
Communication Services0.8%0.7%
Industrials0.2%0.0%
Not on ChartRow8.2%0.0%

Sector weights, charted#

FSPTXXLK

Estimated portfolio characteristics#

Data provided bySource: Twelve Data
FSPTXXLK
P/E (trailing)——
P/B10.110.4
Dividend yield0.41%0.59%
Earnings growth (TTM)+77.4%+71.7%

Weighted by each fund's filed holdings, over the members we track. Shown only when every fund's tracked coverage is high enough for the average to mean something.

Growth from any starting date#

Data provided bySource: Twelve Data

Hover to move the starting point — every fund rebases to 1× at that date, so the comparison holds from any entry point back to 2020 (the earliest date all 2 funds existed). Log scale, weekly total returns.

0.13×0.25×0.5×1×2×4×8×rebased: Nov 2020
FSPTX2.9×XLK3.0×
Rebase at

Hover anywhere to rebase every line to 1× at that date and compare growth from that point — or pick a year above, which is the same thing with an address. Log scale.

Fund flows#

PeriodFSPTXXLK
Aug 2026−$195.6M—
Jul 2026−$186.1M—
Jun 2026−$65.3M−$509.6M
May 2026+$59.2M+$632.8M
Apr 2026+$787.7M+$2.2B
Mar 2026−$244.7M+$199M

Net creations minus redemptions, derived from consecutive SEC N-PORT filings. The form only exists since mid-2019.

Fund flows, charted#

FSPTXXLK

Methodology#

Returns are total returns (dividends reinvested) from daily adjusted closes. Holdings, overlap, sector weights and flows derive from each fund's public SEC filings (Form N-PORT), anchored on the latest filing and rolled forward daily by price moves. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight across shared holdings. See each fund's full holdings: FSPTX holdings · XLK holdings. Past performance does not predict future returns; not investment advice.

FAQ#

FSPTX or XLK — which is better?
XLK is the cheaper fund (0.08% vs 0.61% expense ratio). Over the last five years XLK returned more (+130.62% vs +129.65%, total return). Their portfolios overlap by about 64% of weight. FSPTX, a managed sector fund, against XLK, the sector's index ETF.
How much do FSPTX and XLK overlap?
FSPTX and XLK overlap by about 64% of portfolio weight, sharing 34 holdings (per each fund's latest SEC N-PORT filing, weights rolled forward to today).
Is ChartRow affiliated with any of these funds?
No. ChartRow is independent and not affiliated with, sponsored by, or endorsed by Fidelity, State Street. Comparisons are derived independently from public SEC filings and market data; not investment advice.