PRDGX vs VIG (2026)
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF side by side. VIG is the cheaper fund (0.05% vs 0.64% expense ratio). Over the last five years VIG returned more (+65.36% vs +57.43%, total return). Their portfolios overlap by about 52% of weight. Not investment advice.
Fund facts#
| PRDGX | VIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Focus | Active Stock Funds | Dividend Growth |
| Expense ratio | 0.64% | 0.05% |
| AUM | $23.7B | $117.7B |
| Distribution yield | — | 1.44% |
| Holdings | 94 | 331 |
| 1 month return | +5.0% | +6.2% |
| YTD return | +13.5% | +14.1% |
| 1 year return | +15.7% | +15.6% |
| 3 years return | +66.4% | +71.9% |
| 5 years return | +57.4% | +65.4% |
| 10 years return | — | +264.2% |
| 3Y CAGR | +18.5%/yr | +19.8%/yr |
| 5Y CAGR | +9.5%/yr | +10.6%/yr |
| 10Y CAGR | — | +13.8%/yr |
| Issuer | T. Rowe Price | Vanguard |
| Inception | — | 2006-04-21 |
All returns are total returns (dividends reinvested), from daily adjusted closes. CAGR = compound annual growth rate. '—' means the fund's history doesn't span the horizon. A mutual fund's AUM is its whole fund's, every share class together (its SEC filing); an ETF's is its own. Returns run to Oct 30, 2026, the last month-end, as fund companies report a mutual fund's: a fund that pays monthly books each month's income on its last business day, so a return to a later day would leave that month's income out.
Annualized returns (CAGR)#
Compound annual growth rate per holding period, total return, from weekly adjusted closes. Horizons a fund's history can't span show no bar; horizons no fund spans are omitted.
Performance, rebased#
Returns by year#
| Year | PRDGX | VIG |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | — | +22.2% |
| 2018 | — | -2.1% |
| 2019 | — | +29.6% |
| 2020 | +13.9% | +15.4% |
| 2021 | +26.0% | +23.8% |
| 2022 | -10.2% | -9.8% |
| 2023 | +13.7% | +14.5% |
| 2024 | +13.5% | +17.0% |
| 2025 | +14.7% | +14.2% |
| 2026 YTD | +13.5% | +14.1% |
Total returns (dividends reinvested), calendar years.
Returns by year, charted#
Holdings overlap#
PRDGX and VIG overlap by about 52% of portfolio weight — 59 shared holdings out of 94 in PRDGX and 331 in VIG, from each fund's latest SEC filing (Jun 30, 2026 / Jul 31, 2026).
Top 10 holdings, side by side#
Merged top 10 across the funds — each column is the holding's % of that fund.
Sector weights#
| Sector | PRDGX | VIG |
|---|---|---|
| Technology | 25.2% | 24.6% |
| Financials | 19.6% | 21.5% |
| Healthcare | 14.4% | 19.6% |
| Industrials | 11.8% | 10.5% |
| Consumer Staples | 7.1% | 9.6% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 6.4% | 5.0% |
| Energy | 5.2% | 0.5% |
| Utilities | 4.2% | 2.8% |
| Materials | 3.0% | 2.9% |
| Real Estate | 1.4% | 0.0% |
| Communication Services | 0.8% | 0.0% |
| Not on ChartRow | 0.8% | 3.0% |
Sector weights, charted#
Estimated portfolio characteristics#
| PRDGX | VIG | |
|---|---|---|
| P/E (trailing) | — | — |
| P/B | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| Dividend yield | 1.39% | 1.49% |
| Earnings growth (TTM) | +32.4% | +17.7% |
Weighted by each fund's filed holdings, over the members we track. Shown only when every fund's tracked coverage is high enough for the average to mean something.
Growth from any starting date#
Hover to move the starting point — every fund rebases to 1× at that date, so the comparison holds from any entry point back to 2019 (the earliest date all 2 funds existed). Log scale, weekly total returns.
Fund flows#
| Period | PRDGX | VIG |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 2026 | — | +$119.2M |
| Jun 2026 | −$392M | +$542.2M |
| May 2026 | −$389.3M | −$114.6M |
| Apr 2026 | −$366M | +$213.2M |
| Mar 2026 | — | +$208.2M |
| Feb 2026 | — | +$135.4M |
Net creations minus redemptions, derived from consecutive SEC N-PORT filings. The form only exists since mid-2019.
Fund flows, charted#
Methodology#
Returns are total returns (dividends reinvested) from daily adjusted closes. Holdings, overlap, sector weights and flows derive from each fund's public SEC filings (Form N-PORT), anchored on the latest filing and rolled forward daily by price moves. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight across shared holdings. See each fund's full holdings: PRDGX holdings · VIG holdings. Past performance does not predict future returns; not investment advice.
FAQ#
- PRDGX or VIG — which is better?
- VIG is the cheaper fund (0.05% vs 0.64% expense ratio). Over the last five years VIG returned more (+65.36% vs +57.43%, total return). Their portfolios overlap by about 52% of weight. PRDGX, a managed fund, against VIG, the index it is measured by — what the manager added, or cost, after fees.
- How much do PRDGX and VIG overlap?
- PRDGX and VIG overlap by about 52% of portfolio weight, sharing 59 holdings (per each fund's latest SEC N-PORT filing, weights rolled forward to today).
- Is ChartRow affiliated with any of these funds?
- No. ChartRow is independent and not affiliated with, sponsored by, or endorsed by T. Rowe Price, Vanguard. Comparisons are derived independently from public SEC filings and market data; not investment advice.