PTTAX vs BND (2026)
PIMCO Total Return Fund A and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF side by side. BND is the cheaper fund (0.03% vs 0.86% expense ratio). Over the last five years PTTAX returned more (+0.61% vs -0.86%, total return). Their portfolios overlap by about 0% of weight. Not investment advice.
Fund facts#
Data provided bySource: Twelve DataReturns as of market close, Oct 30, 2026. The charts run through the Oct 30 close.
| PTTAX | BND | |
|---|---|---|
| Focus | Bond Funds | Aggregate Bonds |
| Expense ratio | 0.86% | 0.03% |
| AUM | $47.7B | $153.6B |
| Distribution yield | — | 4.18% |
| Holdings | 870 | 1800 |
| 1M total | +2.8% | +2.4% |
| YTD total | -0.7% | -0.4% |
| 1Y total | +0.3% | -0.2% |
| 3Y total | +20.8% | +17.0% |
| 5Y total | +0.6% | -0.9% |
| 10Y total | — | +15.5% |
| 3Y total CAGR | +6.5%/yr | +5.4%/yr |
| 5Y total CAGR | +0.1%/yr | -0.2%/yr |
| 10Y total CAGR | — | +1.5%/yr |
| Issuer | PIMCO | Vanguard |
| Inception | — | 2007-04-03 |
All returns are total returns (dividends reinvested), through the latest price during the session. CAGR = compound annual growth rate. '—' means the fund's history doesn't span the horizon. A mutual fund's AUM is its whole fund's, every share class together (its SEC filing); an ETF's is its own. Returns run to Oct 30, 2026, the last month-end, as fund companies report a mutual fund's: a fund that pays monthly books each month's income on its last business day, so a return to a later day would leave that month's income out.
Annualized returns (CAGR)#
Data provided bySource: Twelve DataCompound annual growth rate per holding period, total return, from weekly adjusted closes. Horizons a fund's history can't span show no bar; horizons no fund spans are omitted.
Performance, rebased#
Data provided bySource: Twelve DataReturns by year#
Data provided bySource: Twelve Data| Year | PTTAX | BND |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | — | +3.6% |
| 2018 | — | -0.1% |
| 2019 | — | +8.8% |
| 2020 | +8.5% | +7.7% |
| 2021 | -1.2% | -1.9% |
| 2022 | -14.4% | -13.1% |
| 2023 | +6.0% | +5.7% |
| 2024 | +2.3% | +1.4% |
| 2025 | +9.0% | +7.1% |
| 2026 YTD | -0.7% | -0.4% |
Total returns (dividends reinvested), calendar years.
Returns by year, charted#
Holdings overlap#
PTTAX and BND overlap by about 0% of portfolio weight — 18 shared holdings out of 870 in PTTAX and 1800 in BND, from each fund's latest SEC filing (Jun 30, 2026 / Jun 30, 2026).
Only in PTTAX
UMBS, TBA (17.7%), United States Treasury (14.3%), Government National Mortgage Association (7.4%), PIMCO SHORT ASSET PORTFOLIO (3.9%), Fannie Mae (3.4%) and 847 more.
Only in BND
United States Treasury Note/Bond (48.2%), Fannie Mae Pool (7.2%), Freddie Mac Pool (6.2%), Ginnie Mae II Pool (4.8%), Vanguard Cmt Funds-Vanguard Market Liquidity Fund (0.9%) and 1777 more.
Top 10 holdings, side by side#
Merged top 10 across the funds — each column is the holding's % of that fund.
Growth from any starting date#
Data provided bySource: Twelve DataHover to move the starting point — every fund rebases to 1× at that date, so the comparison holds from any entry point back to 2019 (the earliest date all 2 funds existed). Log scale, weekly total returns.
Fund flows#
| Period | PTTAX | BND |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2026 | +$485.1M | +$3.7B |
| May 2026 | +$414M | +$5.1B |
| Apr 2026 | −$314.6M | +$2.8B |
| Mar 2026 | — | −$1.2B |
| Feb 2026 | — | +$2.9B |
| Jan 2026 | — | +$4.2B |
Net creations minus redemptions, derived from consecutive SEC N-PORT filings. The form only exists since mid-2019.
Fund flows, charted#
Methodology#
Returns are total returns (dividends reinvested) from daily adjusted closes. Holdings, overlap, sector weights and flows derive from each fund's public SEC filings (Form N-PORT), anchored on the latest filing and rolled forward daily by price moves. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight across shared holdings. See each fund's full holdings: PTTAX holdings · BND holdings. Past performance does not predict future returns; not investment advice.
FAQ#
- PTTAX or BND — which is better?
- BND is the cheaper fund (0.03% vs 0.86% expense ratio). Over the last five years PTTAX returned more (+0.61% vs -0.86%, total return). Their portfolios overlap by about 0% of weight. PTTAX, a managed fund, against BND, the index it is measured by — what the manager added, or cost, after fees.
- How much do PTTAX and BND overlap?
- PTTAX and BND overlap by about 0% of portfolio weight, sharing 18 holdings (per each fund's latest SEC N-PORT filing, weights rolled forward to today).
- Is ChartRow affiliated with any of these funds?
- No. ChartRow is independent and not affiliated with, sponsored by, or endorsed by PIMCO, Vanguard. Comparisons are derived independently from public SEC filings and market data; not investment advice.
