ChartRow logo
Share this page

FTIHX vs VXUS (2026)

FTIHX
▼
VXUS
▼
+ Add ticker

Fidelity Total International Index Fund and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF side by side. FTIHX is the cheaper fund (0.06% vs 0.07% expense ratio). Over the last five years VXUS returned more (+47.49% vs +47.31%, total return). Their portfolios overlap by about 23% of weight. Not investment advice.

Returns as of market close, Oct 30, 2026. The charts run through the Oct 30 close.

FTIHXVXUS
FocusInternational Stock FundsTotal Intl
Expense ratio0.06%0.07%
AUM$25.3B$122.9B
Distribution yield—2.40%
Holdings49968490
1M total-3.0%-3.0%
YTD total+10.2%+10.0%
1Y total+13.2%+13.0%
3Y total+75.1%+74.1%
5Y total+47.3%+47.5%
10Y total—+138%
3Y total CAGR+20.5%/yr+20.3%/yr
5Y total CAGR+8.1%/yr+8.1%/yr
10Y total CAGR—+9.1%/yr
IssuerFidelityVanguard
Inception—2011-01-26

All returns are total returns (dividends reinvested), through the latest price during the session. CAGR = compound annual growth rate. '—' means the fund's history doesn't span the horizon. A mutual fund's AUM is its whole fund's, every share class together (its SEC filing); an ETF's is its own. Returns run to Oct 30, 2026, the last month-end, as fund companies report a mutual fund's: a fund that pays monthly books each month's income on its last business day, so a return to a later day would leave that month's income out.

Annualized returns (CAGR)#

Data provided bySource: Twelve Data
FTIHXVXUS

Compound annual growth rate per holding period, total return, from weekly adjusted closes. Horizons a fund's history can't span show no bar; horizons no fund spans are omitted.

Total return, rebased to 0% · FTIHX vs VXUS
YearFTIHXVXUS
2017—+27.5%
2018-14.4%-14.4%
2019+21.5%+21.7%
2020+11.1%+10.7%
2021+8.4%+9.0%
2022-16.3%-16.1%
2023+15.5%+15.9%
2024+5.0%+5.1%
2025+32.6%+32.3%
2026 YTD+10.2%+10.0%

Total returns (dividends reinvested), calendar years.

Returns by year, charted#

FTIHXVXUS

Holdings overlap#

FTIHX and VXUS overlap by about 23% of portfolio weight — 290 shared holdings out of 4996 in FTIHX and 8490 in VXUS, from each fund's latest SEC filing (Jul 31, 2026 / Jul 31, 2026).

Only in FTIHX

TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MFG CO LTD (4.3%), SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD (2.1%), TENCENT HLDGS LTD (0.9%), ROCHE HOLDING AG (0.8%), NESTLE SA (0.6%) and 4701 more.

Only in VXUS

TSM (4.0%), Vanguard Cmt Funds-Vanguard Market Liquidity Fund (2.4%), Samsung Electronics Co Ltd (2.0%), Tencent Holdings Ltd (0.9%), Roche Holding AG (0.7%) and 8195 more.

Top 10 holdings, side by side#

FTIHXVXUS

Merged top 10 across the funds — each column is the holding's % of that fund.

Sector weights#

SectorFTIHXVXUS
Technology4.7%8.3%
Financials5.9%5.2%
Energy3.0%2.7%
Healthcare2.5%2.8%
Consumer Discretionary2.1%1.9%
Materials1.7%1.6%
Industrials1.4%1.5%
Consumer Staples1.1%1.1%
Utilities0.3%0.4%
Real Estate0.3%0.3%
Communication Services0.2%0.2%
Not on ChartRow76.9%74.1%

Sector weights, charted#

FTIHXVXUS

Growth from any starting date#

Data provided bySource: Twelve Data

Hover to move the starting point — every fund rebases to 1× at that date, so the comparison holds from any entry point back to 2017 (the earliest date all 2 funds existed). Log scale, weekly total returns.

0.25×0.5×1×2×4×rebased: Nov 2017
FTIHX1.9×VXUS1.9×
Rebase at

Hover anywhere to rebase every line to 1× at that date and compare growth from that point — or pick a year above, which is the same thing with an address. Log scale.

Fund flows#

PeriodFTIHXVXUS
Jul 2026+$458.1M+$1.3B
Jun 2026+$237.1M+$2.5B
May 2026+$435.1M−$225.2M
Apr 2026—−$620.9M
Mar 2026—+$678.3M
Feb 2026—−$1.3B

Net creations minus redemptions, derived from consecutive SEC N-PORT filings. The form only exists since mid-2019.

Fund flows, charted#

FTIHXVXUS

Methodology#

Returns are total returns (dividends reinvested) from daily adjusted closes. Holdings, overlap, sector weights and flows derive from each fund's public SEC filings (Form N-PORT), anchored on the latest filing and rolled forward daily by price moves. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight across shared holdings. See each fund's full holdings: FTIHX holdings · VXUS holdings. Past performance does not predict future returns; not investment advice.

FAQ#

FTIHX or VXUS — which is better?
FTIHX is the cheaper fund (0.06% vs 0.07% expense ratio). Over the last five years VXUS returned more (+47.49% vs +47.31%, total return). Their portfolios overlap by about 23% of weight. FTIHX and VXUS on the same index — a mutual fund priced once a day against an ETF traded all day: the fee, the tracking and the minimum.
How much do FTIHX and VXUS overlap?
FTIHX and VXUS overlap by about 23% of portfolio weight, sharing 290 holdings (per each fund's latest SEC N-PORT filing, weights rolled forward to today).
Is ChartRow affiliated with any of these funds?
No. ChartRow is independent and not affiliated with, sponsored by, or endorsed by Fidelity, Vanguard. Comparisons are derived independently from public SEC filings and market data; not investment advice.