AEPGX vs VXUS (2026)
American Funds EUPAC Fund Class A and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF side by side. VXUS is the cheaper fund (0.07% vs 0.83% expense ratio). Over the last five years VXUS returned more (+47.49% vs +21.87%, total return). Their portfolios overlap by about 14% of weight. Not investment advice.
Fund facts#
Data provided bySource: Twelve DataReturns as of market close, Oct 30, 2026. The charts run through the Oct 30 close.
| AEPGX | VXUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Focus | International Stock Funds | Total Intl |
| Expense ratio | 0.83% | 0.07% |
| AUM | $140.9B | $122.9B |
| Distribution yield | — | 2.40% |
| Holdings | 376 | 8490 |
| 1M total | -5.1% | -3.0% |
| YTD total | +4.9% | +10.0% |
| 1Y total | +6.4% | +13.0% |
| 3Y total | +60.7% | +74.1% |
| 5Y total | +21.9% | +47.5% |
| 10Y total | — | +138% |
| 3Y total CAGR | +17.1%/yr | +20.3%/yr |
| 5Y total CAGR | +4.0%/yr | +8.1%/yr |
| 10Y total CAGR | — | +9.1%/yr |
| Issuer | Capital Group | Vanguard |
| Inception | — | 2011-01-26 |
All returns are total returns (dividends reinvested), through the latest price during the session. CAGR = compound annual growth rate. '—' means the fund's history doesn't span the horizon. A mutual fund's AUM is its whole fund's, every share class together (its SEC filing); an ETF's is its own. Returns run to Oct 30, 2026, the last month-end, as fund companies report a mutual fund's: a fund that pays monthly books each month's income on its last business day, so a return to a later day would leave that month's income out.
Annualized returns (CAGR)#
Data provided bySource: Twelve DataCompound annual growth rate per holding period, total return, from weekly adjusted closes. Horizons a fund's history can't span show no bar; horizons no fund spans are omitted.
Performance, rebased#
Data provided bySource: Twelve DataReturns by year#
Data provided bySource: Twelve Data| Year | AEPGX | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | — | +27.5% |
| 2018 | — | -14.4% |
| 2019 | — | +21.7% |
| 2020 | +24.8% | +10.7% |
| 2021 | +2.5% | +9.0% |
| 2022 | -23.1% | -16.1% |
| 2023 | +15.6% | +15.9% |
| 2024 | +4.7% | +5.1% |
| 2025 | +28.7% | +32.3% |
| 2026 YTD | +4.9% | +10.0% |
Total returns (dividends reinvested), calendar years.
Returns by year, charted#
Holdings overlap#
AEPGX and VXUS overlap by about 14% of portfolio weight — 57 shared holdings out of 376 in AEPGX and 8490 in VXUS, from each fund's latest SEC filing (Jun 30, 2026 / Jul 31, 2026).
Only in AEPGX
SK HYNIX INC (5.6%), SOFTBANK GROUP CORP (1.9%), UNICREDIT SPA (1.5%), AIRBUS SE (1.3%), SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD (1.3%) and 314 more.
Only in VXUS
Vanguard Cmt Funds-Vanguard Market Liquidity Fund (2.4%), Samsung Electronics Co Ltd (2.0%), SKHY (1.3%), Tencent Holdings Ltd (0.9%), Roche Holding AG (0.7%) and 8428 more.
Top 10 holdings, side by side#
Merged top 10 across the funds — each column is the holding's % of that fund.
Sector weights#
| Sector | AEPGX | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Technology | 11.8% | 8.3% |
| Financials | 3.3% | 5.2% |
| Energy | 4.0% | 2.7% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 2.8% | 1.9% |
| Healthcare | 2.8% | 2.8% |
| Materials | 2.4% | 1.6% |
| Consumer Staples | 1.8% | 1.1% |
| Industrials | 0.7% | 1.5% |
| Utilities | 0.0% | 0.4% |
| Real Estate | 0.4% | 0.3% |
| Communication Services | 0.0% | 0.2% |
| Not on ChartRow | 69.9% | 74.1% |
Sector weights, charted#
Growth from any starting date#
Data provided bySource: Twelve DataHover to move the starting point — every fund rebases to 1× at that date, so the comparison holds from any entry point back to 2019 (the earliest date all 2 funds existed). Log scale, weekly total returns.
Fund flows#
| Period | AEPGX | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 2026 | — | +$1.3B |
| Jun 2026 | +$5.6B | +$2.5B |
| May 2026 | −$1.2B | −$225.2M |
| Apr 2026 | −$801.4M | −$620.9M |
| Mar 2026 | — | +$678.3M |
| Feb 2026 | — | −$1.3B |
Net creations minus redemptions, derived from consecutive SEC N-PORT filings. The form only exists since mid-2019.
Fund flows, charted#
Methodology#
Returns are total returns (dividends reinvested) from daily adjusted closes. Holdings, overlap, sector weights and flows derive from each fund's public SEC filings (Form N-PORT), anchored on the latest filing and rolled forward daily by price moves. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight across shared holdings. See each fund's full holdings: AEPGX holdings · VXUS holdings. Past performance does not predict future returns; not investment advice.
FAQ#
- AEPGX or VXUS — which is better?
- VXUS is the cheaper fund (0.07% vs 0.83% expense ratio). Over the last five years VXUS returned more (+47.49% vs +21.87%, total return). Their portfolios overlap by about 14% of weight. AEPGX, a managed fund, against VXUS, the index it is measured by — what the manager added, or cost, after fees.
- How much do AEPGX and VXUS overlap?
- AEPGX and VXUS overlap by about 14% of portfolio weight, sharing 57 holdings (per each fund's latest SEC N-PORT filing, weights rolled forward to today).
- Is ChartRow affiliated with any of these funds?
- No. ChartRow is independent and not affiliated with, sponsored by, or endorsed by Capital Group, Vanguard. Comparisons are derived independently from public SEC filings and market data; not investment advice.
